Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 15(10): e46578, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937038

RESUMO

Abdominal pain in pregnant individuals presents diagnostic challenges, especially when appendicitis is suspected. We report a rare case of a 26-year-old pregnant female with recurrent right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain initially misdiagnosed as a urinary tract infection. Diagnostic uncertainty led to a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, which revealed a right adnexal cystic structure and a thickened tubular structure adjacent to the cecal pole, raising concerns of complicated appendicitis. Subsequent diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a right-sided fallopian tube paratubal cyst with 360-degree torsion and associated fallopian tube torsion without the involvement of the ovary. The cyst was successfully excised, and the patient subsequently delivered a healthy baby via emergency lower section caesarean section. Abdominal pain during pregnancy has various causes. Diagnosing appendicitis during pregnancy is challenging due to anatomical and physiological changes. Ultrasound (US) is commonly used but has limited accuracy. Computed tomography (CT) is avoided due to radiation risks, while MRI is increasingly used and shows high diagnostic accuracy or aids in alternative diagnoses. Regardless of the diagnosis, the prompt recognition of intraabdominal pathology is crucial to prevent fetal morbidity. This case highlights the challenges in the accurate diagnosis of abdominal pain during pregnancy and emphasizes the importance of considering alternative pathologies to prevent delays in treatment and complications. Clinicians should consider diagnostic laparoscopy for pregnant patients with equivocal investigations and lower abdominal pain. The differential diagnosis may include both common and rare causes such as concomitant paratubal cyst and isolated fallopian tube torsion (IFTT), emphasizing a high index of suspicion and collaboration with obstetric colleagues to ensure optimal care.

3.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31995, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589171

RESUMO

Emphysematous gastritis is a rare surgical condition. Although there is a lack of a common definition, the key features of its presentation include gastric emphysema on imaging and the presence of gas-forming organisms in the gastric mucosa. In this study, we report the case of an 80-year-old Caucasian male who presented with abdominal pain; a computed tomography scan demonstrated gastric emphysema (intra-mural air within the stomach). After upper gastrointestinal endoscopy excluded gross perforation, ulcer, and malignancy, the patient recovered to baseline with conservative management consisting of gastric rest (nil by mouth and nasogastric tube decompression), intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous proton pump inhibitor. Given the wide pathogenic mechanisms for gastric emphysema, we recommend a conservative but cautious approach if the patient does not demonstrate clinical features of hemodynamic instability, sepsis, and peritonitis.

4.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(10): 1984-1990, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808480

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute Appendicitis is the most common surgical presentation within Australia. Despite the increasing use of radiological investigations to aid clinical diagnosis, many appendectomies result in a histologically normal appendix. This study examines the histological negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) in a metropolitan hospital and determine factors associated with a negative appendicectomy (NA). METHODS: Patients who underwent emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Logan Hospital, Australia, between February 2016 and March 2019 inclusive were included. Clinicopathologic and imaging variables were analysed for associations with NA. RESULTS: A total of 1241 patients underwent emergency appendicectomy of which 121 patients (9.8%) had a NA. The NAR for clinical diagnosis alone (no imaging) was 9.9%, 14.5% for ultrasonography alone and computed tomography scan alone was 4.9%. Univariate analysis revealed age <27 years (P < 0.001), absence of hypertension (P = 0.008), symptoms >48 hours (P < 0.001), absence of leucocytosis (P < 0.001), undergoing ultrasonography only (P < 0.001), undergoing computed tomography scan only (P < 0.001), macroscopically normal appendix (P < 0.001) and time to operation >24 hours (P < 0.001) were associated with NA. Multivariate analysis identified symptoms >48 h at presentation (odds ratio (OR) 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-3.24; P = 0.007), absence of leucocytosis (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.52-3.81; P < 0.001) and macroscopically normal appendix (OR 5.70, 95% CI 3.49-9.33; P < 0.001) to be associated with a NA. CONCLUSION: The NAR reported is lowest in an Australian institution. The identified predictors of NA will be useful in identifying patients who would truly benefit from an appendicectomy versus those would have a higher rate of NA who may be suitable to be treated non-operatively to be spared the unnecessary morbidity of surgery.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Apendicite , Apêndice , Adulto , Apendicite/diagnóstico por imagem , Apendicite/cirurgia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Erros de Diagnóstico , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...